20 Years of Research Reveals: Jerusalem Belongs to Jews
by Hillel Fendel
Jacques Gauthier, a non-Jewish Canadian lawyer who spent 20 years researching
the legal status of Jerusalem, has concluded: "Jerusalem belongs to the Jews, by
international law."
Gauthier has written a doctoral dissertation on the topic of Jerusalem and its
legal history, based on international treaties and resolutions of the past 90
years. The dissertation runs some 1,300 pages, with 3,000 footnotes. Gauthier
had to present his thesis to a world-famous Jewish historian and two leading
international lawyers - the Jewish one of whom has represented the Palestinian
Authority on numerous occasions.
Gauthier's main point, as summarized by Israpundit editor Ted Belman, is that a
non-broken series of treaties and resolutions, as laid out by the San Remo
Resolution, the League of Nations and the United Nations, gives the Jewish
People title to the city of Jerusalem. The process began at San Remo, Italy,
when the four Principal Allied Powers of World War I - Great Britain, France,
Italy and Japan - agreed to create a Jewish national home in what is now the
Land of Israel.
San Remo
The relevant resolution reads as follows: "The High Contracting Parties agree to
entrust... the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be
determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory [which] will be
responsible for putting into effect the [Balfour] declaration... in favour of
the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people."
Gauthier notes that the San Remo treaty specifically notes that "nothing shall
be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing
non-Jewish communities in Palestine" - but says nothing about "political" rights
of the Arabs living there.
The San Remo Resolution also bases itself on Article 22 of the Covenant of the
League of Nations, which declares that it is a "a sacred trust of civilization"
to provide for the well-being and development of colonies and territories whose
inhabitants are "not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous
conditions of the modern world."
League of Nations
The League of Nations' resolution creating the Palestine Mandate, included the
following significant clause: “Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the
historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for
reconstituting their national home in that country." No such recognition of Arab
rights in Palestine was granted.
In 1945, the United Nations took over from the failed League of Nations - and
assumed the latter's obligations. Article 80 of the UN Charter states: "Nothing
in this Chapter shall be construed, in or of itself, to alter in any manner the
rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing
international instruments to which Members of the United Nations may
respectively be parties."
UN Partition Plan
However, in 1947, the General Assembly of the UN passed Resolution 181, known as
the Partition Plan. It violated the League of the Nations' Mandate for Palestine
in that it granted political rights to the Arabs in western Palestine - yet,
ironically, the Jews applauded the plan's passages while the Arabs worked to
thwart it.
Resolution 181 also provided for a Special regime for Jerusalem, with borders
delineated in all four directions: The then-extant municipality of Jerusalem
plus the surrounding villages and towns up to Abu Dis in the east, Bethlehem in
the south, Ein Karem and Motza in the west, and Shuafat in the north.
Referendum Scheduled for Jerusalem
The UN resolved that the City of Jerusalem shall be established as a separate
entity under a special international regime and shall be administered by the
United Nations. The regime was to come into effect by October 1948, and was to
remain in force for a period of ten years, unless the UN's Trusteeship Council
decided otherwise. After the ten years, the residents of Jerusalem "shall be
then free to express by means of a referendum their wishes as to possible
modifications of regime of the City."
The resolution never took effect, because Jordan controlled eastern Jerusalem
after the 1948 War of Independence and did not follow its provisions.
After 1967
After the Six Day War in 1967, Israel regained Jerusalem and other land west of
Jordan. Gauthier notes that the UN Security Council then passed Resolution 242
authorizing Israel to remain in possession of all the land until it had “secure
and recognized boundaries.” The resolution was notably silent on Jerusalem, and
also referred to the "necessity for achieving a just settlement of the refugee
problem,” with no distinction made between Jewish and Arab refugees.
Today
Given Jerusalem's strong Jewish majority, Gauthier concludes, Israel should be
demanding that the long-delayed city referendum on the city's future be held as
soon as possible. Not only should Israel be demanding that the referendum be
held now, Jerusalem should be the first order of business. "Olmert is sloughing
us off by saying [as he did before the Annapolis Conference two months ago],
'Jerusalem is not on the table yet,'" Gauthier concludes. "He should demand that
the referendum take place before the balance of the land is negotiated. If the
Arabs won’t agree to the referendum, there is nothing to talk about."
Arutz Sheva News
27 Jan 2008
|